During the Israelites' conquest of Canaan, led by Joshua, strategic decisions were made about which cities to destroy. Hazor was a major city and a significant threat, so it was burned completely. This action was not just about conquest but also about eliminating a powerful enemy stronghold that could pose future threats to Israel's security. The fact that other cities built on mounds were spared indicates a thoughtful approach to warfare. By preserving these cities, the Israelites could utilize existing infrastructure, facilitating their settlement in the land. This decision reflects a balance between military strategy and practical foresight, ensuring that while enemies were subdued, the resources and potential of the land were not wasted. It underscores a theme of divine guidance and wisdom in leadership, where not all battles are fought with the same intensity, and not all victories require total destruction. The burning of Hazor alone signifies its unique threat level and the necessity of its complete eradication for the safety and future of Israel.
Yet Israel did not burn any of the cities built on their mounds—except Hazor, which Joshua burned.
Joshua 11:13
FaithAi Explains
Believers are deepening their faith with FaithAi
Thousands of users are experiencing daily spiritual growth and a renewed connection with God.